ETFs

TOP traded ETFs

Market Contextualization

The month of April 2026 was defined by a paradox that helps explain retail investor behavior: while the macroeconomic backdrop grew progressively more complex—characterized by oil prices breaching the $100 mark, heightened tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, industrial deterioration in Germany, and persistently high long-duration yields—US equity markets continued to notch fresh all-time highs, propelled by artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and upward revisions in corporate earnings.

Against this backdrop, the asset allocation choices of retail clients revealed a logic that was far less speculative (e.g., increasing exposure to risk-on assets trading at higher premiums) than it might appear at first glance. Allocations were primarily concentrated in broad-based, liquid, and highly transparent instruments, favoring structural exposure to the US, global technology, and partial hedges against geopolitical and inflationary shocks.

The clear leadership of S&P 500-linked ETFs—namely the Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS, the Source S&P 500 EUR Hedged, and the iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS—mirrored the conviction that the United States remains the primary engine of global growth. Even in the face of elevated crude prices, geopolitical risk, and the ongoing debate over sticky inflation, investors continued to favor companies with robust cash generation, significant technological moats, and the capacity to monetize the AI capital expenditure cycle. April consolidated the perception that the US market remains relatively more resilient than Europe, largely because corporate earnings continue to surprise to the upside and global capital flows remain directed toward US assets.

The strong inflows into the iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS precisely reinforce this thesis. The month was dominated by the semiconductor narrative, GPU, DRAM, and wafer shortages, massive capital expenditures in computing capacity, and the continuation of the global race surrounding generative AI. Intel, AMD, ARM, TSMC, and other key players within the tech ecosystem functioned as the true engine of market sentiment, even as several technical indicators began to signal overbought conditions and divergences typical of late-cycle market phases.

Concurrently, demand for the iShares MSCI World UCITS, the Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS, and the iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS suggests that many investors preferred not to adopt an overly concentrated view solely on the US. These choices reflect a pursuit of global diversification at a time when markets began to clearly differentiate robust economies from regions more vulnerable to energy shocks. The Euro currency hedge integrated into some of these vehicles also demonstrates growing concern over Dollar volatility and the erratic behavior of the EUR/USD pair in an environment of high monetary policy uncertainty.

On the other hand, the presence of the iShares Gold Producers UCITS reveals that investors did not ignore systemic risks. Gold benefited simultaneously from Chinese demand, inflationary fears, and the need for tail-risk protection against extreme geopolitical events. The rally in commodities, coupled with energy scarcity and fears of global supply chain disruptions, led many investors to seek traditionally defensive assets.

This same defensive rationale helps explain the inclusion of the iShares Lehman 20+ Year Treasury. Despite the pressure exerted on long-term bonds by elevated yields, the narrative that an eventual economic slowdown might force the Federal Reserve to pivot and resume rate cuts sooner than currently discounted by the market began to gain traction. Consequently, a segment of investors appears to be building positions in anticipation of future monetary normalization and a capital appreciation of long-duration sovereign debt.

Finally, the inclusion of the Amundi CAC 40 indicates that, despite European underperformance, selective demand persists for French large-cap companies, particularly within luxury, energy, industrials, and consumer staples. However, Europe entered April visibly more fragile due to the energy shock, deteriorating German macro indicators, and a lower capacity for structural growth when compared to the US.

Overall, retail investor allocations during April revealed a hybrid positioning: on one hand, robust exposure to structural US growth and the artificial intelligence theme; on the other, a gradual introduction of diversification and hedging mechanisms against inflation, geopolitical volatility, and the risk of a future slowdown. The preference for broad, liquid ETFs also demonstrates a less speculative, more strategic approach, seeking a balance between participating in the tech bull market and mitigating emerging macroeconomic risks.

Looking ahead to the coming weeks, the outlook remains constructive but decidedly more delicate than at the onset of the rally. Corporate earnings remain solid, and the AI momentum provides strong secular support for technology and semiconductors. However, the market is beginning to flash signs of technical fatigue, characterized by momentum divergences, extreme concentration in a handful of mega-caps, and heightened sensitivity to long-duration yields and oil prices.

Should crude stabilize below recent highs and some diplomatic progress materialize in the Middle East, US indices could extend their upward trajectory into May. Conversely, an escalation of the energy crisis, sticky inflation, or a further tightening of financial conditions could trigger a more meaningful consolidation phase, particularly within the highly overextended AI segments. In such a scenario, global ETFs, currency-hedged strategies, and defensive exposures to gold and long-duration bonds are poised to become increasingly relevant within retail portfolios.

Legal information

The information contained herein identifies the most purchased ETFs, in the reference period by Banco Carregosa clients, not considering any personal element of a specific potential investor. No elements were considered to assess the suitability of any investment or disinvestment to a specific person, therefore it should not constitute an investment recommendation. Potential investors are responsible for their investment decisions, and should carefully consider their investment objectives, financial situation, tolerance and capacity to bear the risk of investing in the financial instruments in question. 

Potential investors should make their own investment decisions and obtain professional clarification and advice on the characteristics and risks of the services and financial instruments in question, appropriate to their level of knowledge and experience,in particular, of price changes and possible loss of capital. Any subscription or redemption orders are the sole responsibility of the potential investor, and before any investment decision is made potential investors must acknowledge and accept the terms and conditions of the documents specific to each Fund, which are available for consultation herein, including the"Prospectus" and the "Key Information Document" (KID).

Management Companies may share with Banco Carregosa, as distributor, a portion of the Management and/or Distribution Fees charged by the fund, as well as offer othernon-monetary benefits. Non-monetary benefits are understood to be access to research and investment recommendation documents and access for Banco Carregosa employees to conferences and training organised by the Management Companies. In any case, the receipt of these fees does not compromise the independence of Banco Carregosa.